The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.” No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. It was deliberately crafted to exclude a wide variety of political offenses, such as criticizing the government,” Lawson said.Īrticle 3, Section 3 of the Constitution spells out what is considered treason in the United States: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. Article 3 of the United States Constitution limits the crime of treason to two specific offenses: levying war against the United States, and adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. “As a technical legal matter, no, and not even close. But during the Cold War, treasonous conduct was often prosecuted under other statutes,” they wrote on Tuesday.Ĭarlton Lawson, a University of California At Davis law professor, also said in the Chicago Tribune that the alleged actions weren’t close to the constitutional definition of treason. “Prosecution under the federal treason statute is ultimately unlikely because we are not at war with Russia. But even Trump critics Norman Eisen and Richard Painter, in a New York Times op-ed, said treason isn’t a factor in the current debate. "This is moving into perjury, false statements and even potentially treason,” said a Trump political component, Senator Tim Kaine, on Tuesday. have bandied about the word in relation to Trump Jr.’s email and conversations with a Russian attorney.
In a current political debate, opponents of Donald Trump Jr.
Accusations of treason are a serious matter in the public arena, but history shows few examples of charges followed by convictions in legitimate treason cases.
0 kommentar(er)
